this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)
Machine Learning
1 readers
1 users here now
Community Rules:
- Be nice. No offensive behavior, insults or attacks: we encourage a diverse community in which members feel safe and have a voice.
- Make your post clear and comprehensive: posts that lack insight or effort will be removed. (ex: questions which are easily googled)
- Beginner or career related questions go elsewhere. This community is focused in discussion of research and new projects that advance the state-of-the-art.
- Limit self-promotion. Comments and posts should be first and foremost about topics of interest to ML observers and practitioners. Limited self-promotion is tolerated, but the sub is not here as merely a source for free advertisement. Such posts will be removed at the discretion of the mods.
founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
worst reviews ever. Some of them even didn't read the paper. For example, a reviewer pointed out I have to cite another paper and kindly showed the title of it, which I've already included in the paper. And the reviewer gave me reject, with maximum confidence :)
Similar. I said I ran five individual runs and reported the average results. However the reviewer asked me to show how many random seeds I used. It’s also a reject with max confidence :)