this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2023
1382 points (97.8% liked)

Sync for Lemmy

15132 readers
2 users here now

๐Ÿ‘€


Welcome to Sync for Lemmy!

Download Sync for Lemmy


Welcome to the official Sync for Lemmy community.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Community Rules


1- No advertising or spam.

All types of advertising and spam are restricted in this community.



Community Credits

Artwork and community banner by: @MargotRobbie@lemmy.world


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Unless anyone knows another reason for this impressive increase in comments? Seems to roughly coincide with Sync launching. If thats the case, just goes to show the importance of good third party apps.

Source: https://lemmy.fediverse.observer/dailystats

EDIT: Looks like a confusingly labeled graph and I think this is total comments. I have no idea why that spike could exist though.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Not important. The amount of comments:posts is probably >10:1
So having comments being 10x as important than a post is kinda self explanatory.
But the sync app is still in beta so for 1.0 it will probably be done.

[โ€“] induna_crewneck@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Still in beta but already wanting people to spend money to remove ads or get Ultra

[โ€“] 9point6@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The dev needs to eat. You're not forced to give him money, stop complaining.

[โ€“] induna_crewneck@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not saying the prices are too high or not justified. I just don't think you can excuse missing features by saying it's still in beta when at the same time full pricing is in place.

[โ€“] aetrix@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I'll be honest I didn't even notice it was missing until I read this thread, but I'm not too bent out of shape about it

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)