this post was submitted on 08 Dec 2023
810 points (97.3% liked)

linuxmemes

21291 readers
951 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
  •  

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!


    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't fork-bomb your computer.

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] maf@szmer.info 11 points 11 months ago (11 children)

    This restriction is meant to protect high definition content from being ripped by pirates. Open systems don't offer the same DRM guarantees as the locked ones.

    [–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 22 points 11 months ago (7 children)

    locked ones don't provide DRM guarantees either. it takes a script kiddie five minutes to break DRM whenever some new scheme comes out.

    [–] cooljacob204@kbin.social 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

    It's probably contractual obligations from shitty media companies.

    [–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

    quite probably. Ironically it does nothing helpful because pirates are gonna pirate.

    [–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

    If anything, it's does the opposite by driving would-be legitimate buyers (well... Subscribers) into piracy.

    You won't provide it to me even if I pay you, because you don't like the system I use? Fine, I'll keep my money and pirate it instead.

    [–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

    the Dutch East India Company were the bad guys. Just saying.

    [–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

    ...ok?

    TF does that have to do with modern media piracy?

    [–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

    If the monopoly is the bad guys… the pirates are the good guys, right?

    [–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 9 points 11 months ago

    Ah, I see.

    If purchasing isn't owning, then pirating can't be stealing.

    load more comments (5 replies)
    load more comments (8 replies)