this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2023
561 points (93.5% liked)

Technology

72686 readers
1825 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Paragone@lemmy.world 52 points 2 years ago (6 children)

Illegal Anti-Competitive / Cartel behaviour, yes??

Apple, you are only exempt-from-law UNTIL the regulators decide to do their jobs honestly.

THEN, you're hosed.

_ /\ _

[–] Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago (5 children)

I mean, even the EU already exempted iMessage from the new rules.

Because they already follow a standard. SMS and MMS.

And with them adopting RCS? There’s nothing they can force to open iMessage.

[–] jormaig@programming.dev 32 points 2 years ago (2 children)

They exempted iMessage because it's not big in Europe. If it were as big as in the US it would've fallen under the DMA.

[–] filister@lemmy.world 22 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Exactly I don't know a single person in Europe who uses or cares about iMessages. This is in the US only.

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 years ago

I have seen some iphone users use it with some other iphone users. But it's very rare.

[–] polle@feddit.de 4 points 2 years ago

TIL iMessage is still a thing.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)