this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2023
271 points (97.9% liked)

Canada

7203 readers
153 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Universities


💵 Finance / Shopping


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] labsin@sh.itjust.works 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (6 children)

Why wouldn't it help the environment? The only way producers can pollute less is if it would cost less money. It will and can only happen if it pays to produce less co2

[–] XbSuper@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (5 children)

So put the cost to the companies, not me. I'm stretched thin as is, I don't have more money for another stupid tax. Maybe if I had a little extra, I'd consider installing a few solar panels in my home, or perhaps a new EV. But no, instead the government will find a way to reach into my pocket to take what's left.

[–] agarorn@feddit.de 3 points 11 months ago (3 children)

.... So do you think if the companies would need to pay the tax, they wouldn't just transfer the cost onto you? What would this solution make better?

[–] XbSuper@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Maybe, I'm honestly not sure what the right answer is, just that this does nothing but hurt Canadians already struggling. It won't slow the use of gasoline in the slightest.

But really, I never expect anything to be done for the people. Aside from a select lucky few, the world is set against us from the day we're born.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)