this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2023
398 points (98.1% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5055 readers
523 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
398
World's richest 10% produce half of global carbon emissions, says Oxfam (2015) (slrpnk.net)
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by iraq_lobster@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
48 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/dec/02/worlds-richest-10-produce-half-of-global-carbon-emissions-says-oxfam

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] OhmsLawn@lemmy.world 62 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (6 children)

Edit: Note that this article is over 8 years old.

I had to look it up, but In 2021 the top 10% were earning about $120K/year.

Also, the guardian misrepresented the study in their title. The study is about "lifestyle emissions" The top 10% don't produce 50% of all global emissions.

[โ€“] StarsWebWine@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

That top 10 percent figure is for USA. This is talking about world wide, so likely the top 10 percent is for a lot of people in the USA, and other western countries....There are a lot of people in 3rd world countries that don't contribute any emissions compared to the average low income person in a western country.

load more comments (5 replies)