this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2023
198 points (85.6% liked)

Risa

6899 readers
17 users here now

Star Trek memes and shitposts

Come on'n get your jamaharon on! There are no real rules—just don't break the weather control network.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] andthenthreemore@startrek.website 26 points 10 months ago (9 children)

I don't see Seven as ASD coded. She has levels of trauma that can sometimes be mistaken as ASD and has lived outside of regular human society for much of her life.

[–] 7of9@startrek.website -4 points 10 months ago (8 children)

You're completely right, there is obviously no deeper meaning to presenting a character who is a mature adult yet requires structured classes in order to learn how human beings socialise.

[–] KaleDaddy@beehaw.org 6 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Im guessing based on your username this character is an obsession of yours, and there's a need to insist your interpretations are absolute fact. But unless the writer's state explicitly what they were intending with her character. Its all just opinions.

On another note. Despite what you might think based on a lot of comments, it is possible to discuss things on the Internet without being unnecessarily smug and condescending purely because someone contradicted your head cannon

[–] 7of9@startrek.website 1 points 10 months ago

Not an obsession, I tuned out of watching Voyager when it was first on TV and I'm partway through a complete watch now ... she's simply my favorite character from the show, and given that Star Trek fans have a pleasant and active community here I thought it was a good choice. Perhaps I was mistaken.

Being interpreted as smug was not my intention, I thought I was simply stating my opinion with equal force to the poster above. How should I have responded?

[–] porthos@startrek.website 1 points 10 months ago

You’d think after eating all that kale you wouldn’t be so rudee

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)