this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2023
65 points (94.5% liked)

British Columbia

1338 readers
127 users here now

News, highlights and more relating to this great province!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 38 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (19 children)

This may be my naive opinion, but more than two counts of drunk driving or any counts of driving (e: drunk) with a suspended license should put someone beneath the minimum qualifications for being able to have a license at all, ever.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 16 points 8 months ago (16 children)

You need a license to drive only if you get caught.

Over here people get their license suspended for 10 years and still get caught drunk driving without a license, unless they're put in jail what are we to do?

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (4 children)

You need a license to drive only if you get caught.

You need a license to drive, period. It's a rule you agree to follow as a driver whether someone is doublechecking you or not.

The 'It's not a crime unless I get caught' mentality is very troubling, and potentially dangerous, to all the upright people who just want to live in peace.

[–] fiah@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 8 months ago

t's a rule you agree to follow as a driver

so is not driving under influence? Why should they care about having a license if they're going to drive drunk anyway, rules aren't stopping them

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)