this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2023
443 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

59377 readers
5811 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 4 points 10 months ago (4 children)

The lowest latency links right now are already wireless point to point links.

[–] binomialchicken@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 10 months ago (3 children)
[–] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

My PhD in electrical engineering.

[–] binomialchicken@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Care to elaborate or point to a reliable source?

[–] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago

It should be fairly intuitive. Sending electromagnetic radiation through copper or fiber will add physical distance versus a direct line of sight link. And the refractive index of light in the atmosphere is significantly lower, so the radiation actually propagates faster. Over long distances, those microseconds will add up.

The best example of this is the stock exchange in Chicago (and elsewhere) uses a low latency microwave link to save several milliseconds over the fiber links.