this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2023
11 points (100.0% liked)

Science

2 readers
6 users here now

This magazine is dedicated to discussions on scientific discoveries, research, and theories across various fields, including physics, chemistry, biology, astronomy, and more. Whether you are a scientist, a science enthusiast, or simply curious about the world around us, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on a wide range of scientific topics. From the latest breakthroughs to historical discoveries and ongoing research, this category covers a wide range of topics related to science.

founded 1 year ago
 

This cross-sectional study uses validated instruments to assess long-term decisional regret and satisfaction following gender-affirming mastectomy.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Hallainzil@startrek.website 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

That isn't what that number says. All it tells you is that at least 50% of respondents scored a zero.

FWIW, trans rights are human rights. No disagreement there. But that's not what that number is telling you.

[–] Infiltrated_ad8271@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Moreover, they say that the media talk about 1% (or less, realistically), but here there are barely 139 respondents.

Disclaimer: Just highlighting a fact for those who fall for confirmation bias, trans rights and blah blah blah to avoid harassment.

[–] MelastSB@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

To add to that, there might sadly be a survivor bias : some people who regretted were not able to give their opinion

[–] Bluskale@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

That’s a good point too. Come to think of it, you could also have had missing numbers from the other direction too: people who wouldn’t have regretted it but didn’t have the opportunity to give their opinion.