this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2024
93 points (89.1% liked)

Programming

17443 readers
160 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] darkmatternoodlecow@programming.dev 33 points 9 months ago (9 children)

Yeah! And integers do way too many things as well. Counters, indexes, number of orange slices in an orange, there's just no end to the wacky things people try to make integers do, and it's impossible to keep track of it all when looking at code. And floats? Don't get me started on floats. Angles, probabilities, weights, heights, degrees of separation from Kevin Bacon ... I'm getting dizzy just listing all these different things that floats do.

It's a big problem, because there isn't an easy way to fix it in every programming language known to man, and someone needs to write more articles about this to get more hits for their sites.

[–] andrew@lemmy.stuart.fun 31 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Wait till you hear what strings are under the hood. Integers in a trench coat!

[–] darkmatternoodlecow@programming.dev 22 points 9 months ago (1 children)

And the boolean is revealed as the archvillain working behind the scenes, pulling the strings of all its minions.

[–] nitefox@sh.itjust.works 4 points 9 months ago

You thought it was true but it was I, One!

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

It’s integers all the way down.

load more comments (6 replies)