this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2024
14 points (64.6% liked)

Fediverse

17722 readers
1 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BrikoX@lemmy.zip 6 points 9 months ago (8 children)

It's algorithmic and run by venture capital. 2 things that made social media the toxic mess it is today.

[–] timconspicuous@lemmy.ml 5 points 9 months ago (7 children)

The algorithms/feeds are easily the best part about Bluesky because they can be custom-made. If you don't like the feeds provided by Bluesky, you can just make one of your own that displays what you want to see. I use many such feeds.

[–] BrikoX@lemmy.zip 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

If that's what you like, use it. Nobody is telling you can't. Those that prefer non-algorithmic vs algorithmic social media will always be in disagreement, since they are fundamentally opposite of each other.

[–] spaduf@slrpnk.net 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

This is a particularly silly opinion because Lemmy is an algorithmic social media platform. It's just an algorithm that you happen to have access to documentation for. Almost certainly, any fediverse algorithm would have to work on the same principles as Lemmy (open and based on public interactions). Likes and upvotes are king. User similarity ranking is wildly inefficient on the fediverse due to its distributed nature and keyword systems are easily gamed (although some hybrid is possible).

[–] BrikoX@lemmy.zip 2 points 9 months ago

Sure, Lemmy has algorithms, but it's not the same as being algorithmic. We can continue to argue on the semantics of technical definition, but my point on the issue with toxic mess was clear a few messages above. Intent of the implementation really is the factor that defines the different between platform being algorithmic and using algorithms.

If a user has a chronological feed, and it reaches the top (or bottom) of the content, the user is likely to close the app/page and do something else, but an endless feed will keep the same user longer.

And using user input to sort content is not the same as prioritizing content based on past interactions to achieve a predefined goal.

E.g. Twitter API allowed to pull content in chronological order of only people you followed, but the official app used For You feed as default and even if you changed it manually to chronological in the settings it would reset on app restart. Contrast that with being able to set any sorting method as default on Lemmy or having no algorithm on Mastodon (yet the API allows anyone to create one if they wish) and the difference of intent is clear.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)