Technology

59295 readers

4310 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Excuse me, but the industries AI is disrupting are not lucrative (www.theintrinsicperspective.com)

submitted 11 months ago by kpw@kbin.social to c/technology@lemmy.world

15 comments fedilink hide all child comments

A more interesting “bear case” for AI is that, if you look at the list of industries that leading AIs like GPT-4 are capable of disrupting—and therefore making money off of—the list is lackluster from a return-on-investment perspective, because the industries themselves are not very lucrative. What are AIs of the GPT-4 generation best at? It’s things like:

writing essays or short fictions

digital art

chatting

programming assistance

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] justhach@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (5 children)

Weird that AI isnt replacing things like management, CEOs, stock investors, accountants... you know, jobs that tend to be about numbers and efficiency, which you would think AI would excel at.

Instead, we have it skirting copyright by stealing other people works and changing it just enough to not be a direct copy.

[–] kpw@kbin.social 0 points 11 months ago (4 children)

stock investors, accountants

Computers already replaced a lot of them long ago.

management, CEOs

What part of their jobs do you think an AI can replace?

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 11 months ago (3 children)

What part of their jobs do you think an AI can replace?

The whole sitting around, profiting from actual laborers part, I'm guessing.

[–] Blackhole@sh.itjust.works 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The fucking antiwork crowd is insufferable and intellectually dishonest. Be better. This is such a sad comment.

[–] GeneralVincent@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Why? Why can an AI not replace a CEO? And why has CEO compensation risen, while average worker compensation dropped, all while worker output has increased over the past decades? That seems like simple math, that the money isn't going to who it should be going to and is just going to management and investors because they make the rules

load more comments (1 replies)