Linux

48222 readers

978 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

nooter692@lemmy.ml

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml

cypherpunks@lemmy.ml

cyclohexane@lemmy.ml

d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz

Forgetting the history of Unix is coding us into a corner [The Register] (www.theregister.com)

submitted 9 months ago by 0x0f@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/linux@lemmy.ml

32 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] samc@feddit.uk 59 points 9 months ago (14 children)

At the end there's a little jab towards Wayland:

Today, the Wayland enthusiasts like to talk about how they are modernizing the Linux graphics stack. But Linux is a Unix, and in Unix, everything is meant to be a file. So any Wayland evangelists out there, tell us: where in the file system can I find the files describing a window on the screen under the Wayland protocol? What file holds the coordinates of the window, its place in the Z-order, its colour depth, its contents?

As far as I'm aware nobody has even considered extending the file metaphor to the graphics stack, and it sounds a bit ridiculous to me.

It also reminds me of this talk that suggests maybe trying to express everything as a file might not be the best idea...

[–] XTL@sopuli.xyz 9 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Plan9, more or less, does its graphics through filesystems.

[–] kbal@kbin.melroy.org 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Dennis Ritchie and Ken Thompson [...] ignored what the industry was doing, went back to their original ideas, and kept working on refining them. The result is the next step in the development of Unix

Plan 9 is clearly what the article is talking about. Odd that they don't name it.

[–] BaumGeist@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 months ago

They do, if you consider that this article doesn't stand alone at all and read the blurb at the very bottom in italics acknowledging that it's part of a bigger series

load more comments (11 replies)