this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2024
471 points (97.0% liked)

Technology

59219 readers
3235 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Google confirms Gmail is “here to stay” amid speculation over plans to scrap the email service::Claims that Google plans to sunset Gmail were a hoax, so there's no need to panic

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 110 points 8 months ago (7 children)

Google getting rid of gmail would have to be hands down one of the biggest internet shakeups since its inception. Gmail has been the de facto free email service for almost two decades now. They have like a 53% market share of emails in the U.S.

[–] waratchess@lemm.ee 51 points 8 months ago (6 children)

Also the shitstorm it would cause, when you can't access an account that you used Gmail to sign up.

[–] stealth_cookies@lemmy.ca 39 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Maybe it would finally force the surprising number of websites out there that don't allow for email changes to change their policies. I recently switched every account I could to a personal domain and I couldn't believe how many just don't allow for it.

[–] tool@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

It's likely because they use it as the primary/unique identifier for the account, which is just dumb. It's like they've never heard of a UUID/GUID before.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)