this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2024
263 points (86.0% liked)

Technology

59402 readers
4058 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A new report from plagiarism detector Copyleaks found that 60% of OpenAI's GPT-3.5 outputs contained some form of plagiarism.

Why it matters: Content creators from authors and songwriters to The New York Times are arguing in court that generative AI trained on copyrighted material ends up spitting out exact copies.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 80 points 8 months ago (18 children)

The individual GPT-3.5 output with the highest similarity score was in computer science (100%), followed by physics (92%), and psychology (88%).

And that’s why this claim is mostly bullshit. These use cases are all sciences, where the correct solution is usually the same or highly similar no matter who writes it. Small snippets of computer code cannot be copyrighted anyway.

Not surprisingly, softer subjects like “English” and “Theatre” rank extremely low on this scale.

[–] pulaskiwasright@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

You can’t write a paper covering scientific topics without plagiarism. A human would be required to. Generative AI should be held to at least as high of a standard.

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Turns out ChatGPT isn’t writing a scientific paper though, it’s conversing with the user.

[–] pulaskiwasright@lemmy.ml 0 points 8 months ago

If it’s regurgitating other people’s work then it needs citations.

load more comments (16 replies)