this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2024
287 points (90.0% liked)

Canada

7210 readers
301 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


๐Ÿ Meta


๐Ÿ—บ๏ธ Provinces / Territories


๐Ÿ™๏ธ Cities / Local Communities


๐Ÿ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


๐Ÿ’ป Universities


๐Ÿ’ต Finance / Shopping


๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ Politics


๐Ÿ Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Grimpen@lemmy.ca 2 points 8 months ago (9 children)

I'd be satisfied with 90% for a top tax bracket.

Problem is that once you are wealthy enough you can move around the world. Similar to how Microsoft Ireland is somehow where most of Microsoft's profits occur. I think there is a big role for international treaties here.

[โ€“] villasv@lemmy.ca 0 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Well count me in for 90% if we can get there, don't want to let perfect be the enemy of good.

Wealth moving around isn't that big of a problem really, people keep touting "wealth exodus" is a huge economic risk but rarely has that really outweighed whatever the benefits that caused it.

[โ€“] Grimpen@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Fair enough, if the wealth isn't benefiting anyone, than it's exodus won't hurt anyone.

[โ€“] Kedly@lemm.ee 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

And new, more contributing wealth will move in to take its place even if the old wealth moves

load more comments (6 replies)