this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2024
25 points (96.3% liked)

Canada

7210 readers
395 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Universities


💵 Finance / Shopping


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 13 points 8 months ago (9 children)

Interesting.

A company found guilty of contravening the law could be fined a maximum of 6% of its gross global revenues

Real penalties.

Let's see what ends up in it and whether there would be something unacceptable.

[–] ASaltPepper@lemmy.one 4 points 8 months ago (8 children)

I'm curious where the fediverse would fit into this. Or even Nostr where from my understanding taking down information is much harder.

The bill would also sharply raise the penalties for those found guilty of advocating or promoting genocide.

Should be interesting to see how this affects those speaking on the Israel-Gaza conflict. Especially if we as a country continue to support Israel.

[–] folkrav@lemmy.ca 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

As usual with these laws, the people writing them are most likely completely removed from, don’t really care about, nor understand the underlying technologies they’re legislating on. Easiest example to illustrate this is looking at countries pushing for (or already adopting) anti-encryption and online age verification. It’s almost always with those half-measure laws that the most dystopian, privacy invading, abusable stuff gets voted through.

[–] kbal@fedia.io 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Oh, this one has the fingerprints of the age verification people all over it. It's just that instead of the government mandating it directly (at great political cost because nobody wants it) they've set up a commission given the task of studying the question of what should be done to "protect the children" and making regulations as it sees fit. The age verification lobby, anti-porn crusaders, and giant social media companies will battle for control of the new regulator in this new venue made just for them.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)