this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2024
150 points (98.1% liked)

Linux Gaming

15842 readers
18 users here now

Gaming on the GNU/Linux operating system.

Recommended news sources:

Related chat:

Related Communities:

Please be nice to other members. Anyone not being nice will be banned. Keep it fun, respectful and just be awesome to each other.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Alex Deucher:

The HDMI Forum has rejected our proposal unfortunately. At this time an open source HDMI 2.1 implementation is not possible without running afoul of the HDMI Forum requirements.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LufyCZ@lemmy.world 30 points 8 months ago (16 children)

But displayport exists, is widely used and is free?

[–] kerobaros@lemmy.world 30 points 8 months ago (6 children)

Because DisplayPort is run by VESA, who better understand the appeal of an open standard.

[–] LufyCZ@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago (4 children)

That's not the point of my comment, the point is that whatever hdmi is, it's got very healthy competition, so there's no real reason for anti-trust stuff

[–] RandoCalrandian@kbin.social 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

No it doesn’t, because it’s generally monitor manufacturers that add display port, and people who want to run on large tvs are SoL

[–] LufyCZ@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (2 children)

That's on the tv manufacturers though, it's their choice.

When most TV manufacturers are part of the HDMI "standards" committee, they obviously have a vested interest in not using other technologies, especially when they provide many of the accessories used with TVs. If they allowed competing standards on their TVs, why would consumers buy their products instead of the competitors?

[–] RandoCalrandian@kbin.social 3 points 8 months ago

A choice they are making in favor of a tech cartel instead of what is best for their customers, which is the problem we want addressed

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)