this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2024
741 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

59219 readers
3235 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gabe@literature.cafe 137 points 8 months ago (45 children)

Welcome to the hell of being a lemmy admin. There's a reason why lemmy admins are fed up with the developers.

[–] gabe@literature.cafe 111 points 8 months ago (30 children)

For context, there's a lot that goes on behind the scenes when it comes to lemmy admin stuff especially in the matrix channels. There is a significant frustration and lack of confidence in the lemmy developers at this point. Even those who try to contribute to the project get eventually feeling pushed out.

[–] aeharding@lemmy.world 20 points 8 months ago (2 children)

That sucks. As a 3rd party Lemmy app developer, I've only had positive interactions with the Lemmy devs. They're even being proactive in communications.

[–] tool@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Try submitting a pull request for something in one of the core repos.

They behave as if every line of code in your commit is a sentence proclaiming "Why yes, your wife is a whore, your dog doesn't love you, AND your baby is ugly."

I'm not kidding, there's no hyperbole in that statement. Go read some of their declined pull requests threads for some entertainment.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (28 replies)
load more comments (42 replies)