This is in regard to Lemmy.world blocking piracy communities from other instances. This post is not about whether you agree with the decision. It's about how the admins informed their users.

A week ago Lemmy.world announced their Discord server. This wasn't very well received (about 25% downvotes, which is rather bad compared to other announcements). The comments on that post were turned off, presumably to avoid backlash.

Before that, announcements about the instance used to be posted to !lemmyworld@lemmy.world. This time, the information was posted on the Discord server instead.

I don't agree with this. Having to use a proprietary platform to participate in an open-source one goes against the very purpose for me, especially when the new solution isn't really an improvement (as before the information about the platform was closer to it).

Edit: Corrected the announcements community name.

Update: Lemmy.world finally released an announcement and promised they would inform about similar actions and gather feedback in advance in future.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] SgtAStrawberry@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (9 children)

With my very limited understanding of it, I believe Discord was something mostly for "as we are down so much, you can get updates here if we are down".

[–] Deiv@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

At this point they should just make a new instance for their announcements lol

[–] SgtAStrawberry@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe they wanted something off Lemmy so that the attackers can't target both the main and the backup, with the same system.

[–] ALostInquirer@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

Isn't this where Mastodon.world kind of comes into play? Off Lemmy but still a federated service, can even pop whatever LemmyWorld status account there in to one's RSS readers or whatever.

load more comments (6 replies)