this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2024
348 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

59427 readers
2820 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RavuAlHemio@lemmy.world 64 points 8 months ago (13 children)

Doesn’t having admin privileges mean you can load any driver into the kernel anyway, including blatantly malicious drivers?

[–] Limonene@lemmy.world 41 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Microsoft has enforced mandatory digital signatures for drivers, and getting a digital signing key from Microsoft costs a ton of money. So, presumably they do care.

In contrast, consider nProtect GameGuard, the anti-cheat system in Helldivers 2. It is a rootkit, and runs in the kernel. Why does Microsoft permit this? Shouldn't this be blocked? It must be using either an exploit like the article, or a properly signed driver. Either way, Microsoft could fix it -- by patching the exploit, or revoking the signing key.

The fact that Microsoft hasn't done anything about malicious anticheat rootkits is a sign that they really don't care. They just want their payment.

[–] SteveTech@programming.dev 14 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I might be completely wrong, but I've heard that a key is only a few hundred dollars, and once you've got it you can sign whatever you want. I think ReactOS also used to offer free driver signing for open source projects.

So I guess if ReactOS can afford one, so can most anti-cheat companies.

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago

I think what we're trying to say here is FUCK kernel-based anticheat systems!

load more comments (10 replies)