this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2024
101 points (100.0% liked)

Steam Hardware

19711 readers
638 users here now

A place to discuss and support all Steam Hardware, including Steam Deck, Steam Machine, Steam Frame, and SteamOS in general.

As Lemmy doesn't have flairs yet, you can use these prefixes to indicate what type of post you have made, eg:
[Flair] My post title

The following is a list of suggested flairs:
[Deck] - Steam Deck related.
[Machine] - Steam Machine related.
[Frame] - Steam Frame related.
[Discussion] - General discussion.
[Help] - A request for help or support.
[News] - News about the deck.
[PSA] - Sharing important information.
[Game] - News / info about a game on the deck.
[Update] - An update to a previous post.
[Meta] - Discussion about this community.

If your post is only relevant to one hardware device (Deck/Machine/Frame/etc) please specify which one as part of the title or by using a device flair.

These are not enforced, but they are encouraged.

Rules:

Link to our Matrix Space

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

While I would still prefer no anti-cheat, this also means we probably won't have to worry about a non-compatible anticheat getting added later.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] warm@kbin.earth 17 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

Anti-cheats are only small hurdles for cheaters and invasive software for regular consumers.

[–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 years ago (3 children)

That is why they keep getting more and more invasive. When they run at kernel level all the time, like Vanguard, it's almost impossible to prevent detection and they can then ban you at a literal hardware level based on your motherboard & CPU identifiers.

You still encounter cheaters every once in a while because they don't immediately ban them, as that would give hints as to what exactly was detected and when.

[–] warm@kbin.earth 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Literally makes no difference, its cat and mouse. Still rampant cheating on Valorant. BattlEye, EAC all the same.

Prevention has proven pointless. In my opinion the best way to combat cheaters is machine learning, non-intrusive and can get increasingly effective.

[–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Oh the days when anyone could download wall hacks and aimbots from a random forum and run them, those were truly great times. It was really nice starting a match in CS and getting shot every time you showed a pixel of your head anywhere. The TF2 sniper bot thing few years back really brought a nostalgic tear to my eye as well.

Anticheat sure sucks, but without them any game with global matchmaking and not a tightly knit set of community run servers with a very active moderation ready to wield the banhammer would literally be unplayable, as people are assholes.

[–] warm@kbin.earth 2 points 2 years ago

Yeah, but we are well passed that.
Some games now restrict certain legitimate programs in the name of "anti cheat", which is stepping well over the line. Kernel level AC needs to go aswell. Server side AC and ML is the proper path we should be taking instead of adding attack vectors, privacy invading software to our PCs.
There's other solutions that can be developed to minimise cheater impact in games, such as trust factor from Valve. We are never going to get rid of cheaters, people are scum, but we can try to minimise their impact.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)