this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2024
566 points (99.0% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54627 readers
764 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

This is another post that alerted me of this.

https://lemmy.world/post/13287681

And here is the modlog:

https://lemmy.world/modlog?page=1&actionType=ModRemoveCommunity

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Arcturus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 201 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (56 children)

Why are people joining .world to begin with? The entire point of this is to decentralize. Joining the by far largest instance beats the entire purpose.

Join smaller ones like lemmy.one, lemmy.club, lemmings.world, lemmy.zip etc. We might need to start specifically recommending against .world and for general purpose instances like those.

Also, funny how even reddit allows r/Piracy but not .world lol

[–] Blaze@dormi.zone 103 points 8 months ago (8 children)

Sync had Lemmy.world as the default instance to register a new account (might still be the case, I'm not sure). One of the factors for sure.

[–] Arcturus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 68 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The dev really needs to change that then.

Perhaps have a system of selecting randomly from a set of hand-picked general purpose instances at sign-up, where having less people gives it a higher chance of being picked (if it's of at least a certain size of course, to prevent spam etc)

[–] Blaze@dormi.zone 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Agree, but easier said than done

[–] henrikx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I'm a programmer and it really is quite easy to implement lol

[–] Blaze@dormi.zone 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The issue is not about the implementation, but the filter: which criteria do you use to select instances that are eligible for the pool of instances? I'm genuinely asking because I think it takes some time to have a look on instances for people to make the best choice.

[–] henrikx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 8 months ago

You're overthinking it. Select a few of the popular ones and be done with it

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (53 replies)