this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2024
38 points (97.5% liked)

PC Gaming

8568 readers
287 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 15 points 8 months ago (4 children)

Pretty much. Most likely that they’ll take the money, and come up incredibly short on their promises without any penalty.

[–] mrbn@lemmy.ca 8 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Without any legal penalties.

But doing so, would surely risk intels reputation and future contracts with the government. The government could also impose other restriction or penalties on intel for non compliance.

But like you say, if intel does come up short, likely nothing will happen (unless some form of negligence is discovered)

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Oh, well, sure. Maybe. I suppose that depends how far they fall short and how upset the government actually gets about it.

[–] Fenrisulfir@lemmy.ca 2 points 8 months ago

The answers will be totally and not at all respectively

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)