Antiwork

8282 readers

1 users here now

We're trying to improving working conditions and pay.
We're trying to reduce the numbers of hours a person has to work.
We talk about the end of paid work being mandatory for survival.

Partnerships:

Matrix/Element chatroom
Discord (channel: #antiwork)
IRC: #antiwork on IRCNow.org (i.e., connect to ircs://irc.ircnow.org and /join #antiwork)
Your facebook group link here
Your x link here
lemmy.ca/c/antiwork

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

My companies RTO FAQ (pastebin.com)

submitted 7 months ago by zer0squar3d@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/antiwork@lemmy.ml

21 comments fedilink hide all child comments

My formerly amazing company just sent us this in an internal email. Unfortunately, too long to post here so I pastebin` it. Hopefully this is allowed.

My apologies if it's not.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 17 points 7 months ago (6 children)

Sounds like a change of employer is in order.

[–] chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz 11 points 7 months ago (3 children)

I personally believe that this is what some of these employers want, including my own. They want to reduce headcount without paying severance or unemployment.

[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

In many states, being forced back to the office after working from home for a long period allows you to collect unemployment if you quit on those grounds. Check your state's requirements. IIRC it has to be demonstrable to be a significant burden but it can count as constructive dismissal.

[–] chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz 3 points 7 months ago

Unfortunately, most don't understand the system, don't know their rights, and won't pursue it.

[–] zer0squar3d@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 7 months ago

Is California one of them?

load more comments (2 replies)