this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2024
15 points (94.1% liked)
British Columbia
1361 readers
8 users here now
News, highlights and more relating to this great province!
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It shouldn’t be run as a business. It should be run as a service. Who cares if there’s a shortfall. That’s the cost of ensuring citizens have cheap, efficient, reliable, green ways of commuting.
In my opinion, the cost of facing overcrowding shouldn’t be coming from fares at all. If you have a better way for people in a city to commute, why charge people who are using that better way more? That just dissuades them from using it.
Tax 101: Tax the people who are choosing unhealthy options, and use the tax to pay for healthy options.
I’m with you on this, but anyone who remotely uses transit will hear an earful from those that “prefers to drive” — source: 10 years of undergrad and grad, hearing kids who drive complain about mandatory UPass.
That’s fine. They can drive. I like driving too. But we should tax that behaviour more and use it to pay for an even better transit system.
Oh I hear you. Not saying they shouldn’t pay. If anything, they should pay even more for putting extra strain on the public infrastructure. Just pointing out that a vocal minority of people feel entitled and that just because they prefer to drive that they shouldn’t need to pay, and they will be very vocal of such tax.