this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2024
498 points (98.1% liked)

Privacy

31981 readers
350 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NineMileTower@lemmy.world 63 points 7 months ago (25 children)

I was under the impression that Google was giving me email out the kindness of their own heart.

[–] BreakDecks@lemmy.ml 39 points 7 months ago (10 children)

When Gmail first came out 20 years ago (as of yesterday), we all thought that. It was a new world and nobody was thinking about the long term ramifications. Before that point, there wasn't even such a thing as a Google account, Google was just a search engine that didn't operate all that differently than Duck Duck Go does today.

I don't even think that Google had a plan at that point in the game. Monetization was the obvious goal, but nobody really thought about what that would look like.

Since then, Google users' privacy has experienced death by a thousand cuts. If the terms you have to agree with today were known then, Gmail never would have succeeded.

With every new product and feature added to a Google account holder's toolbox over the past two decades, creeping normalization came with them, and here we are today...

[–] fluckx@lemmy.world 14 points 7 months ago (9 children)

Exactly. Same as is happening with privacy right now. Chip away bit by bit. Do it all at once and people will complain. But do it bit by bit and they won't know until it's too late.

Similarly to the story of the frog in the boiling water. Drop it in hot water and it'll jump out. Heat the water slowly and it'll boil to death.

But hey. At least we've got nothing to hide right? /S

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 6 points 7 months ago (2 children)

As a side note, here’s what Wikipedia says about the frog experiment:

“While some 19th-century experiments suggested that the underlying premise is true if the heating is sufficiently gradual,[2][3] according to modern biologists the premise is false: changing location is a natural thermoregulation strategy for frogs and other ectotherms, and is necessary for survival in the wild. A frog that is gradually heated will jump out. Furthermore, a frog placed into already boiling water will die immediately, not jump out.[4][5]”

Your point still stands, but you might want to consider switching to another metaphor next time.

Source: Boiling frog

[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Also you could feed two birds with one scone by choosing a less violent metaphor...

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 3 points 7 months ago

Love it! Such a wholesome alternative.

[–] fluckx@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Fair enough. I've never looked it up :)

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Neither did I until one day I stumbled upon a video that explained the misguided experiments that were behind the saying. Just today I started reading about it on Wikipedia and found that juicy summary.

There’s a pretty good reason why we have ethical restrictions and peer review with modern science.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (20 replies)