this post was submitted on 13 Apr 2024
130 points (99.2% liked)

PC Gaming

8576 readers
245 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kadu@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago (3 children)

I guess one could make the argument that if it's so tightly within spec that minor errors can cause catastrophic failure, it can't really handle it.

But it can also be said that this is just user error being reported as "Nvidia bad" because this farms clicks and up votes.

[–] huginn@feddit.it 3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

It's not about how tight the spec is - it's about how poorly designed the connector is if it is easy to partially connect.

You can have very tight specs and not be failure prone.

[–] kadu@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

If a partial connection, a very common event, is not problematic with other GPUs but very problematic with this one - yes, it's correct to affirm being so tightly within spec is a problem, as deviations in real world usage are more than expected.

[–] huginn@feddit.it 2 points 7 months ago

It's not that common with previous connectors though. They snapped in and without a full connection did not work.