A provincial rule to limit short-term rentals to a homeowner's principal residence plus one secondary suite or accessory dwelling comes into force in British Columbia on May 1 in 60 communities, while 17 additional communities have chosen to opt into the rules, despite being exempt.
An update for the province's Short-Term Rental Accommodations Act was provided by Premier David Eby and B.C. Minister of Housing Ravi Kahlon at a media event on Thursday in Langley, B.C.
May 1 is the deadline for many changes telegraphed in October when the province introduced the act.
The government's hope is to limit housing from being rented through platforms like Airbnb, VRBO, Expedia and FlipKey, when they could instead be used for stable, long-term homes in cities where residents struggle to find appropriate housing.
"Balanced new rules to crack down on speculators who are effectively operating mini hotels, while also ensuring homeowners can still rent out spaces in their principal residence," said Eby on Thursday.
I wonder what would happen if we did the same to long term rentals. Would the lack of rentals hurt those who need to rent? Would the influx of homes for sale overcome that?
For us, home ownership isn't a goal at all. We'd be starting late, and we're 1%ers, but our advisor consistently recommends Renting, Stocks, and no maintenance. Our guy expects to beat the growth value over a house (with carry and maintenance costs) by a few percent, and when we hate this place we just move.
And the density means we're in a spot where a lot of services and shops are nearby. We're really satisfied with our plans, but the point is Rentals are our choice and I'd be happy if that pool weren't shrunk.
We also much preferred renting over ownership after trying both. And we were far from 1%.