this post was submitted on 02 May 2024
362 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

59402 readers
2667 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] impure9435@kbin.run 31 points 6 months ago (13 children)

That's ok if you ask me, considering that they will still continue to function as regular thermostats

[–] LemmyBe@lemmy.world 20 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (11 children)

I disagree - definitely not OK by me, though likely legal. People bought this because they wanted and paid extra for an internet connected device, and a regular thermostat is not that. I mean, would you be OK if your TV manufacturer disabled the screen and streamed radio stations instead?

[–] impure9435@kbin.run 4 points 6 months ago

I didn't say it was ideal, but it's ok. And it's definitely better when compared to other companies. Sure, in an ideal world they would have published the source code for their server ensuring that anyone could run their own instance at home. But we don't live in an ideal world.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)