this post was submitted on 07 May 2024
82 points (78.5% liked)

Linux

48245 readers
695 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
82
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by bastonia@lemmy.ml to c/linux@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] m4@kbin.social 21 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (17 children)

Kinda rich dissing KDE for its "unstability" and putting GNOME as its paradigm, the very DE well known to break every major version.

Sometimes this kind of posts/"content" make me feel like I must be the only person in the world who hasn't had major issues with KDE and it's been absolutely flawless lately, specially since 5 - but I then realize people without issues don't complain. It's the people who have issues with something that make the noise and make it a very big deal (and I'd argue most cases are of the PEBCAK type).

If the need is for something simple and stable I'd shoot for something like Xfce - but putting GNOME as the example of "stability" is nothing but laughable.

[–] theshatterstone54@feddit.uk 9 points 6 months ago (3 children)

GNOME doesn't break, extensions do.

[–] optissima@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago (2 children)

They're literally ignoring specs.... and also most of the features of gnome are the extensions, so I'd count that.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 8 points 6 months ago (2 children)

If most of the features you use are gnome extensions you shouldn't be using gnome. There are plenty of other desktops that would meet your needs better.

[–] optissima@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

Most? I don't think that someone who installs Dash to Panel would say most of their features are extensions, just some essential ones. I feel like you could go as far as "If any essential features you use are gnome extensions you shouldn't be using gnome."

[–] theshatterstone54@feddit.uk 3 points 6 months ago

Okay, I agree with that. CSD/SSD is a great example

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 5 points 6 months ago

Its not as bad as some people make it

[–] Adanisi@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Ahaha is that why they're removing everything from the DE and forcing people to use extensions for things like desktop icons? So they can say "it's not us, it's the extensions"?

[–] fromaj_debite@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Why do you want to use desktop icons?

[–] Adanisi@lemmy.zip 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I personally don't, but it's a standard Mac/Windows users are very familiar with, and the ability to add them doesn't impact you if you don't want to.

In other words: it's a net-positive.

Also some people just like them

load more comments (13 replies)