this post was submitted on 09 May 2024
383 points (97.3% liked)

Technology

59219 readers
2836 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] KISSmyOSFeddit@lemmy.world 100 points 6 months ago (3 children)

A software patch for a hardware failure.
Sounds like what they do at Tesla, too.

[–] tja@sh.itjust.works 19 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Well it's also what NASA is doing. Only logical if you don't want to dig it out again.

[–] mynachmadarch@kbin.social 20 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Do you mean with the Voyager FDS? There's a big difference between patching a system 30+ years past it's planned mission date because at everyone's amazement it just keeps going and being valuable versus the Neuralink developing issues a few months after being installed when many expected it to fail because of the news of high failure rate among the primate test subjects beforehand.

[–] escaped_cruzader@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Well, rocket science is not brain surgery