this post was submitted on 12 May 2024
577 points (94.6% liked)

Technology

59427 readers
3449 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bitwaba@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (5 children)

You can easily regulate against that.

[–] Tryptaminev@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

No regulation is worth anything without enforcement.

[–] bitwaba@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Sure. That's step two. You gotta do step one first.

[–] Tryptaminev@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago

I agree. It wasn't meant to be against regulations. Problem is in my city we have plenty of regulations to avoid repurposing flats for tourist rentals without a permit, we have regulations against systematically letting flats empty to be able to sell the house or flat at a premium etc. But we only have like three dozen government employees, who are supposed to oversee a city with more than 1.5 million flats and individual homes. So even if every one of them manages to check on 2 flats every day, they manage like 15.000 flats a year, which is already a rather optimistic estimate.

It is crucial to not only demand regulation, but also that enough resources are assigned to enforce them.

load more comments (2 replies)