this post was submitted on 20 May 2024
1595 points (97.2% liked)

Technology

58157 readers
3886 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
  • Linus Torvalds, creator of Linux, does not believe in cryptocurrencies, calling them a vehicle for scams and a Ponzi scheme.
  • Torvalds was once rumored to be Bitcoin creator Satoshi Nakamoto, but he clarified it was a joke and denied owning a Bitcoin fortune.
  • Torvalds also dismissed the idea of technological singularity as a bedtime story for children, saying continuous exponential growth does not make sense.
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ulterno@lemmy.kde.social 54 points 4 months ago (16 children)

I actually considered a non-governmental, community regulated currency as a pretty good idea.

Problem is, crypto is too ecologically expensive and wasteful to fit the bill.

While there were some interesting ones, that actually used the processing power for something useful, most are not. So for now, I'll just go with governmental currencies.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago (7 children)

crypto is too ecologically expensive and wasteful

Only some (proof of work) crypto is ecologically expensive and wasteful.

[–] uienia@lemmy.world -2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

As long as they use energy they are wasteful, considering they don't provide anything constructive for that wasted energy which could have been used for better things.

[–] matjoeman@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

By this argument any website is wasteful. There's always a "better thing".

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)