this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2023
691 points (95.9% liked)

Technology

59402 readers
2816 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

OpenAI now tries to hide that ChatGPT was trained on copyrighted books, including J.K. Rowling's Harry Potter series::A new research paper laid out ways in which AI developers should try and avoid showing LLMs have been trained on copyrighted material.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Blapoo@lemmy.ml 74 points 1 year ago (11 children)

We have to distinguish between LLMs

  • Trained on copyrighted material and
  • Outputting copyrighted material

They are not one and the same

[–] Tetsuo@jlai.lu 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Output from an AI has just been recently considered as not copyrightable.

I think it stemmed from the actors strikes recently.

It was stated that only work originating from a human can be copyrighted.

[–] Anders429@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Output from an AI has just been recently considered as not copyrightable.

Where can I read more about this? I've seen it mentioned a few times, but never with any links.

[–] Even_Adder@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They clearly only read the headline If they're talking about the ruling that came out this week, that whole thing was about trying to give an AI authorship of a work generated solely by a machine and having the copyright go to the owner of the machine through the work-for-hire doctrine. So an AI itself can’t be authors or hold a copyright, but humans using them can still be copyright holders of any qualifying works.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)