this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2023
319 points (97.9% liked)

Fediverse

17698 readers
6 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This blog post by Ploum, who was part of the original XMPP efforts long ago, describes how Google killed one great federated service, which shows why the Fediverse must not give Meta the chance

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MyMulligan@lemmy.one 42 points 1 year ago (36 children)

An excellent read. My synopsis is that if any big corporations joined the Fediverse they would fracture it, and that no matter what Meta, Reddit, Google, etc. would never want to see a decentralized platform succeed.

Pretty much the Fediverse needs to never let a big company tie into it. Our group needs to work at growing but at a sustainable rate.

[–] realcaseyrollins@social.freetalklive.com 6 points 1 year ago (20 children)

@MyMulligan @jherazob I disagree.

I think the key thing is to just make sure that you don't use non #FOSS clients. #GoogleTalk started as a client for #XMPP, people migrated to it, and then #Google dropped support for #XMPP. If so many people didn't use #GoogleTalk, the #XMPP network would have remained unimpeded.

[–] Drunemeton@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Exactly! Let them join…and be ignored.

But how do we ignore them? Can you block an entire instance?

[–] BirdLawyerPerson@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Yes. A lot of that is going on with instances being blocked en masse for allowing too many spam/bot accounts without any corresponding high quality activity coming from users registered with that instance. It's very much in flux right now, with instance administrators trying to figure out which metrics to use and what lists to trust, but I imagine a more mature/robust process will be used by most serious instances soon enough.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)
load more comments (33 replies)