this post was submitted on 29 May 2024
134 points (95.3% liked)

Technology

59427 readers
3846 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bassomitron@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago (9 children)

I feel like these will be useless in all but limited circumstances. A modern battlefield in urban centers will be rife with small and large rubble, making these things unreliable in real world practice when you factor its ability to balance navigating obstacles and dealing with recoil. How does it reload? How long does its battery last? What happens when its weapon jams? Additionally, tricking current AI is fairly simple when you have the resources of a modern military.

Anyway, it's interesting to experiment with, but I just don't think the technology is quite there yet. I think it'd probably be more effective to create self-destructing bomber robot dogs than gun toting ones with our current tech.

[–] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 54 points 5 months ago (3 children)

I'm less concerned about how these are deployed against soldiers as I am about how they're being provided to police departments as they are in the US.

[–] ME5SENGER_24@lemmy.world 25 points 5 months ago (1 children)

This is exactly my concern. These little bullet dogs patrolling the street with someone able to take control of the trigger and blame it on a malfunction

[–] variants@possumpat.io 8 points 5 months ago

Reminds me of the move code 8 part 2

[–] Shurimal@kbin.social 9 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Child holding a teddybear.
ED-209: "Put down your weapon! You have 40 seconds to comply!"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZFvqDaFpXeM

Oh, who am I kidding, human cops do exactly the same shit...

[–] TheFriar@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago

https://yewtu.be/watch?v=gcb06Gx9VMA

“Tell him, ironically, he has 10 seconds to grow a pair.”

[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 0 points 5 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://www.piped.video/watch?v=ZFvqDaFpXeM

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Ding ding ding. Rubble-covered battlefields aren’t the end-goal here. The end goal is urban warfare, precision strikes, and area denial by police. Cops can post these on patrol outside of a billionaire’s house. Charging isn’t an issue, because you can simply have them automatically return to base for charging, and patrol in automatically rotating shifts.

Or have them near protests, and “accidentally” start killing people. When people get upset, cops will go “oops it was a malfunction. Too bad you can’t blame us for that. Because of, ya know, the malfunction. It totally malfunctioned. 100% wasn’t programmed to kill on sight, to break up the protest quickly. Nope, definitely a malfunction.”

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

You can't stop a mob with live fire. Patrolling though, yeah.

load more comments (5 replies)