Technology

59402 readers

2997 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

-34

ChatGPT's voice closely resembles Scarlett Johnasson's, says lab analysis (www.npr.org)

submitted 5 months ago by Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

21 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 14 points 5 months ago (10 children)

Why are you trying to side with the company who very obviously did the bad thing then?

[–] chiisana@lemmy.chiisana.net 11 points 5 months ago (8 children)

From the article itself:

The researchers found that Sky was also reminiscent of other Hollywood stars, including Anne Hathaway and Keri Russell. The analysis of Sky often rated Hathaway and Russell as being even more similar to the AI than Johansson.

I’ve watched Her many years back, and I’ve been following a lot of Johansson’s work in the MCU franchise; I don’t hear her in Sky beyond both voices being similarly aged “female” (can’t really assume the gender of the AI model) voices.

If there are statistical analyses that says otherwise, and aligns with at least some anecdotal evidence, then it isn't “very obvious”.

Also, people calling out dissimilarities from their anecdotal observations, along with statistical evidence against your personal view doesn’t equate to siding with the company, or against some popular celebrity; but rather, simply calling out their observations. This is just a discussion as to whether or not the voice is similar, try not to get too personally attached to either parties.

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (7 children)

Ok, then: why are you siding against the very clear and damning evidence to defend an extremely exploitative company with zero regards from anyone else’s rights when it’s very clear that they’re in the wrong?

[–] chiisana@lemmy.chiisana.net 10 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I’m not taking sides. I’m saying I don’t hear the similarities and there’s stats supporting it. That’s all. That’s what I said earlier. No need to take sides.

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee -3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Just asking questions

Just asking questions (also known as JAQing off, or as emojis: "🤔🤔🤔"[1]) is a way of attempting to make wild accusations acceptable (and hopefully not legally actionable) by framing them as questions rather than statements. It shifts the burden of proof to one's opponent; rather than laboriously having to prove that all politicians are reptoid scum, one can pull out one single odd piece of evidence and force the opponent to explain why the evidence is wrong.

The tactic is closely related to loaded questions or leading questions (which are usually employed when using it), Gish Gallops (when asking a huge number of rapid-fire questions without regard for the answers), and Argumentum ad nauseam (when asking the same question over and over in an attempt to overwhelm refutations).

[–] chiisana@lemmy.chiisana.net 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yeah… you’re the one asking questions. I’ve not asked any.

Good luck with your life.

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee -4 points 5 months ago

Yet you refused to explain why you’re siding with those clearly in the wrong.

load more comments (5 replies)

load more comments (6 replies)