this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2024
1353 points (97.4% liked)

linuxmemes

21226 readers
86 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] Katana314@lemmy.world 49 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (17 children)

    Much as I always feel Microsoft has made some horrible missteps around automatic updates...I also think many many users are vocally and unabashedly following horrible update policies.

    The biggest one is "Fuck you, Microsoft, I don't ever want to update." A simple truth about Windows is that it is currently the most popular operating system in the world. If that OS was Unix-based, the resulting truth would still be true: The most popular OS is going to be the most common target for vulnerabilities, hacks, malware, and exploits. Far more than an antivirus, keeping that computer up to date is the most important step for keeping it secure.

    This is true not just of computers used to manage your bank account and nuclear launch codes, but of the swarm of "convenience" computers sitting inside a campus network that could spread a virus to everything on the Wi-Fi.

    So, looking at this image, it's a shame on Microsoft moment if this update came from nowhere, or they once again blatantly ignored the configured update time. It's a shame on the campus moment if someone was repeatedly closing the "Time to update" popup.

    [–] areyouevenreal@lemm.ee 24 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (13 children)

    Other systems like ChromeOS and Silverblue do atomic updates in the background and then switch on next restart. No waiting at screens like this. Heck even the conventional Linux update system, while far from foolproof, doesn't require waiting like this.

    [–] gmtom@lemmy.world -4 points 5 months ago (12 children)
    1. So does windows for the most part

    2. Do you know how often users actually restart their machines without being forced?

    [–] wer2@lemm.ee 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

    Perhaps the solution is to figure out how to update without restarting. It is a hard problem, but a forced restart is the same as a crash from a user perspective.

    [–] megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    Imagine if they replaced the crash screen with a fake automatic update.

    [–] dan@upvote.au 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

    Years ago there was a screensaver that showed a fake "upgrading to Vista, please wait" screen. Just wait for someone to leave their computer unattended, download and set it as the screensaver, and wait for their reaction when they're back :)

    [–] IMongoose@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

    That's some oblivion on xbox shit right there. Hide a restart with a loading screen.

    load more comments (10 replies)
    load more comments (10 replies)
    load more comments (13 replies)