this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2024
1105 points (99.7% liked)

Technology

59358 readers
5091 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Shanedino@lemmy.world 32 points 5 months ago (6 children)

The weird thing is that in this scenario these panels are still applicable for replacement probably because the the solar panels of today compared to then are about ~40% more efficient. So compared to a new replacement it's at around 60% efficiency. A major site plans profit off of 30 years and plans to replace glass at that time, so while it may still be somewhat useful long term it's probably more profitable to replace them.

[–] Natanael@slrpnk.net 41 points 5 months ago (3 children)

... And since they're still good they can be resold and used by others where efficiency isn't the main concern, no need to trash them

[–] K0W4LSK1@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I want to add they aren't even that inefficient for 20 year old tech thats impressive

[–] wedeworps@sh.itjust.works 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I'm sorry to tell you that the nineties were a little longer ago than that!

[–] Dragster39@feddit.de 2 points 5 months ago

You mean I shouldn't wear my baggy pants with a chain for my wallet anymore?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)