this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2024
488 points (99.2% liked)

Work Reform

10003 readers
574 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] placatedmayhem@lemmy.world 99 points 5 months ago (10 children)

The requirement should be that any time an employer makes a demand of an employee's time, they pay.

FA waiting on your plane to arrive that's 6 hours late? Pay up.

15 Apple store employees lined up and waiting to get searched by a single manager after a shift? Pay up.

Require an employee to respond to phone calls or issues after hours? That's not "after hours", that's hours. Pay up.

Make an employee commute to an office for a job that can be accomplished from home? Believe it or not, pay the hell up.

Making demands of a person's time for a job is part of the job. They should be compensated for it.

[–] Damage@feddit.it 12 points 5 months ago (9 children)

... I guess you're writing this because it isn't so... ?

[–] Kalkaline@leminal.space 30 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Learning to demand pay for your time at a job is an important life lesson. Not everyone learns it. I have a coworker on the verge of retirement that eats while working and doesn't take a "no-lunch".

[–] Gestrid@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 months ago

I have a coworker on the verge of retirement that eats while working and doesn't take a "no-lunch".

That's actually illegal in my state, and companies can get in big trouble if the employee doesn't take a break/ lunch.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)