this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2024
606 points (96.5% liked)

Technology

59427 readers
2839 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Gamers_Mate@kbin.run 44 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (52 children)

They just escalated the arms race between ad and ad blocker. All this could have been avoided if they actually did something about the scam ads.

[–] shani66@ani.social 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Not scam ads, intrusive ads. A decade ago i read cracked and the only ads were non intrusive sidebar ads or a banner at the top. They didn't play music, they didn't interrupt what i was doing, they just existed. Google, being the near complete monopoly it is, could easily force the standard to return to that and many people would never even go looking for adblockers.

[–] Gamers_Mate@kbin.run 2 points 5 months ago

I was using that as an umbrella term though I should have specified both scam ads and intrusive ads that are a vector for malware.

load more comments (50 replies)