this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2024
64 points (97.1% liked)

Canada

7209 readers
485 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Meanwhile the LPC oppose the bill while the CPC would work to amend it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 15 points 5 months ago (8 children)

Protect the children, they cry, while permitting flavoured tobacco or something else as terrible

[–] kbal@fedia.io 2 points 5 months ago (7 children)

Tobacco is the health hazard to children and adults alike, not the flavours added to it. But that's another moral panic.

[–] off_brand_@beehaw.org 4 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Flavored tobacco was literally marketed to children, to get them addicted to cigarettes from an early age. The "protect the children" arguments are often used to ban things that made no impact or even positive impact in children's lives (DnD, sexual equality). Or it's used to justify surveillance and overreach (porn bans and she verification laws)

These aren't equivalent.

[–] kbal@fedia.io 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

If anyone's claiming that any of these things is equivalent to another it isn't me, but marketing campaigns aimed at children (for tobacco and in general) are also something we'd be better off without.

[–] ebc@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Isn't that already illegal? As far as I remember, ad breaks during my morning cartoons were either for other shows on the network or Swiffer and laundry detergent.

[–] DerisionConsulting@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

It is illegal, but kids get most content online now. So, although many countries have laws on the books against ads targeting children, it doesn't mean that they don't.

Juul got in trouble for doing this, using ads that were definitely not specifically targeting tweens/teens on websites for Seventeen magazine, cartoon network, and Nick jr.

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/12/health/juul-vaping-lawsuit.html

Edit: correction on the websites

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)