this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2024
106 points (97.3% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5240 readers
653 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
106
Nuclear push would drag out energy transition, PM warns (www.thenewdaily.com.au)
submitted 4 months ago by Five@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
27 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheWinged7@lemm.ee 8 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Burning coal, what we badly need to transition off of, also produces more radioactive waste than a nuclear plant too.

God I wish all our worthless politicians weren't in the coal companies pockets

[–] Auzy@beehaw.org 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

We had a solution for that though. Things like the carbon tax would have had a meaningful impact. And then the libs managed to make it toxic so it can't be reintroduced

[–] Suspiciousbrowsing@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 4 months ago

Carbon tax is the only thing that would have made "carbon capture" viable. So the one tool they are trying to rely on, they directly destroyed themselves.

load more comments (1 replies)