this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2024
22 points (84.4% liked)

Socialism

5184 readers
34 users here now

Rules TBD.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com -1 points 4 months ago (9 children)

I'm not a big fan of the legitimizing violence, personally.

I think the identification of the problem as liberalism's impossible position between the oppressor and oppressed is spot on. But, rather than giving into endless violence, I'm prefer extending the precepts of liberalism without exception.

Liberals always make exceptions. For them, only the worthy poor deserve help, worthiness being arbitrarily determined by some pseudo-philanthropist laundering their savage public image through charity, for example. In the public sphere, we've been convinced that means-testing is an efficient way to distribute goods and resources, never mind the arbitrary power administrators have over those they administrate. Always exceptions.

So, just...get rid of exceptions.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 months ago (3 children)

that's because you're the person the article is talking about

[–] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Did you just read the first line of what I said?

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Nah , I read all of it, and it's still a liberal position that offers nothing tangible or actionable.

[–] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 2 points 4 months ago

What liberal position would?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)