this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2023
13 points (93.3% liked)

Self Hosted - Self-hosting your services.

11406 readers
2 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules

Important

Beginning of January 1st 2024 this rule WILL be enforced. Posts that are not tagged will be warned and if not fixed within 24h then removed!

Cross-posting

If you see a rule-breaker please DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jozza@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I think if you're going to the trouble to amass a music library, you might as well use lidarr so you can be specific about the quality/releases you're pulling in. I've used soulseek a few times over the years and there's a lot of junk/low quality files in there. Even just inconsistently named or tagged. It's not the end of the world but if you're going to implement a system, might as well do it right.

[–] minnix@lemux.minnix.dev 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Where Nicotine/Soulseek excel is finding rare stuff that's usually not distributed via torrent, similar to @Meuzzin@lemmy.world 's comment. Not only that, but friend lists, PMs, as well as browsing music shares from users that have similar interests and advanced filtering for format, bitrate, etc.

A lot of my music collection was never even released on tape, much less CD or streaming, and dealing with Discogs and waiting for sellers to get in stock what you're looking for is a hassle. If your tastes veer toward the more mainstream and official digital releases are available, then torrents may be better for you. For myself and others like me, the choice is pretty clear though.

[–] jozza@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

For sure - if there's no good quality or official copy of what you're after, it makes sense that you'd take what you can get. Out of curiosity, what are you into?

load more comments (2 replies)