this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2024
457 points (93.9% liked)

Linux

48186 readers
1937 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
nooter692@lemmy.ml
AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml
MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml
cypherpunks@lemmy.ml
cyclohexane@lemmy.ml
d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz
457
So I installed Arch Linux... Is this it? (lemmy.ml)
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by SentientFishbowl@lemmy.ml to c/linux@lemmy.ml
240 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I'm a little bit underwhelmed, I thought that based off the fact so many people seem to make using this distro their personality I expected... well, more I guess?

Once the basic stuff is set-up, like wifi, a few basic packages, a desktop environment/window manager, and a bit of desktop environment and terminal customisation, then that's it. Nothing special, just a Linux distribution with less default programs and occasionally having to look up how to install a hardware driver or something if you need to use bluetooth for the first time or something like that.

Am I missing something? How can I make using Arch Linux my personality when once it's set up it's just like any other computer?

What exactly is it that people obsess over? The desktop environment and terminal customisation? Setting up NetworkManager with nmcli? Using Vim to edit a .conf file?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Andromxda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 3 months ago (6 children)

The AUR is pretty awesome. If a piece of software exists on Linux, it's in the AUR. Even software that doesn't have a native Linux version can sometimes be found these, e.g. repackaged versions of Electron apps for Windows.

And once you start really customizing your system, you'll see the value of the Arch Wiki. If there's something you can do on Arch, the Wiki probably has a well-written guide for it.

[–] Thann@lemmy.ml 19 points 3 months ago (1 children)

100% its the Wiki and AUR!

On every other distro, once you want a program not in the package manager, it will likely be broken by the next update. On arch 99.995% of the time it will be in AUR and you can just make a simple PKGBUILD when its not, so your updates will automatically recompile all of your personal projects!

[–] ari_verse@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Well these days we have flatpak to solve the "not in the repo" (or 'old version in the repo') problem.

[–] Andromxda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Only for (some) desktop applications. The AUR has everything, including CLI tools, configurations and even some niche scripts

[–] theshatterstone54@feddit.uk 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Exactly. I hate when people constantly bring in Flatpak, because I'd be happily using Debian, if I could have Qtile Wayland with Qtile-extras and Hyprland in the repos with all their dependencies. But that's never happening, especially for Qtile. These are window managers, you can't package them in a Flatpak. And what about niche cli tools, as you mentioned? Or what about the latest Neovim on Debian? Yes, there's a Flatpak but do you really want to mess with a Flatpaked CLI app? I know I don't.

[–] Andromxda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 months ago

Yeah imagine having to type in flatpak run io.neovim.nvim to launch Neovim

load more comments (4 replies)