this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2024
1280 points (98.0% liked)

Solarpunk Urbanism

1790 readers
22 users here now

A community to discuss solarpunk and other new and alternative urbanisms that seek to break away from our currently ecologically destructive urbanisms.

Checkout these related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 174 points 3 months ago (51 children)

There's a number of other studies that show that, overall, letting people go unhoused is far, far more costly than just fucking housing them. It's not just paying for the cops and demo teams to chase them around, you're also paying for excess use of medical services that wouldn't be taking place otherwise, lost revenue because of people wanting to avoid the homeless, and a bunch of other things that all just pile up. It doesn't help that some startups have entered this space and you've got cities like San Francisco paying them something like 40 or 80 thousand a year to keep the homeless in a fenced off area in a tent grid. It doesn't really fix anything, it's just another shitty, expensive band-aid whose funding could have gone to fixing the problem but didn't.

[–] JohnnyH842@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Not asking as a challenge to your comment, but what studies are you referring to? I'd be interested to learn more.

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I would be very proud to say I had them on hand, but I don't. I'll look around, and share if I find them.

[–] JohnnyH842@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

That would be very cool of you!

load more comments (49 replies)