this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2024
261 points (80.9% liked)

Fediverse

28395 readers
862 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

We propose the symbol ⁂ to represent the fediverse.

...

⁂ is called an asterism. In astronomy, it refers to groups of stars in the sky, akin to constellations. We suggest that it’s a very fitting symbol for the fediverse, a galaxy of interconnected spaces which is decentralised and has an astronomically-themed name. It represents several stars coming together, connecting but each their own, without a centre.

...

@ is the symbol for e-mail. # is the symbol for hashtags. ☮ is the symbol for peace. ♻ is the symbol for recycling. ⁂ can be the symbol for the fediverse. ⁂ is standardised as Unicode U+2042, making it ready to copy and insert anywhere.

Git Repository: fediverse-symbol/fediverse-symbol

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] aasatru@kbin.earth 14 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Testing a little side by side comparison

[–] aasatru@kbin.earth 30 points 2 months ago (1 children)

And in white, for the dark mode folks:

But it's hardly a fair comparison, especially because it seems I cannot upload SVG files to Mbin. I also didn't make the lines thinner or any other adjustments that might be a good idea at this scale. Still, might be better than noting.

[–] Aquila@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] ZeffSyde@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That's just our mascot, the "Lemmdigo".

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago

That probably doesn't mean what you want it to mean.

load more comments (3 replies)